Ethics & Malpractice
At IJRDES journal, maintaining ethical integrity is central to our mission of advancing high-quality scholarly research. We expect all contributors authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers to uphold strong ethical standards throughout the publication process. Authors must ensure that their submissions are original, properly referenced, and free from any form of plagiarism or data manipulation. Submitting the same work to multiple journals or misrepresenting data is considered a serious breach of ethical conduct. Every listed author should have made a genuine contribution to the research and should be accountable for its content. In cases involving human or animal participants, authors are required to provide evidence of ethical approval and compliance with international research guidelines.
Editors of the journal are entrusted with overseeing a fair and impartial peer-review process. They are responsible for selecting reviewers based on subject expertise and ensuring that editorial decisions are made without bias or influence. Editors must protect the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and take appropriate action when ethical concerns are raised, including investigating complaints and issuing corrections or retractions when necessary. The review process is conducted in a double-blind manner to preserve objectivity and academic fairness.
Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts with professionalism and objectivity, offering constructive feedback that contributes to the improvement of the work. They must maintain confidentiality and disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect their impartiality. Using unpublished information from a manuscript for personal advantage is strictly prohibited.
The journal's publisher plays a supportive role in upholding these ethical standards and assists in addressing cases of alleged misconduct. If issues such as plagiarism, falsified data, or authorship disputes arise, the publisher will collaborate with the editorial board to ensure appropriate corrective measures are taken. We are dedicated to promoting transparency, accountability, and trust in the scholarly communication process, in alignment with international publishing standards and ethical practices.
The International Journal of Research and Development in Engineering Sciences (IJRDES) e-ISSN: 2852 - 4201 is multidisciplinary double-blind Peer-Reviewed Research Open Access Journal , we are committed to protecting the intellectual property rights of authors while ensuring the wide dissemination of scholarly work. Upon acceptance of a manuscript for publication, authors are required to either transfer copyright to the journal or grant the journal a license to publish, depending on the chosen publication model (e.g., subscription-based or open access). In the case of open-access publications, the content is typically made available under a Creative Commons licence such as CC BY-NC-SA), which allows others to share and reuse the work with proper attribution, provided that the original authors and source are clearly cited.
Authors retain significant rights over their published work, including the right to use their article for teaching, future research, or distribution in institutional repositories, subject to the terms outlined in the publication agreement. However, reproduction or redistribution of the published material in any form, commercial or otherwise, without appropriate citation or permission, may constitute copyright infringement.
The journal assumes that all submitted content including text, figures, tables, and images is either the original work of the authors or has been used with appropriate permission. Authors are responsible for securing necessary rights and acknowledgments for any third-party material included in their manuscripts.By submitting a manuscript to IRDES, authors confirm that their work does not infringe on any existing copyright and that they agree to abide by the journal’s copyright terms. In case of any legal claims or disputes regarding intellectual property, the journal reserves the right to take corrective action, which may include withdrawal of the article or notification to relevant parties.
The Editor-in-Chief plays a central role in maintaining the academic integrity, quality, and reputation of the journal. They are responsible for setting editorial policies, overseeing the peer-review process, and making final decisions on manuscript acceptance or rejection based solely on scholarly merit, originality, and relevance to the journal’s scope. The Editor-in-Chief ensures that all submissions are evaluated fairly, without bias or conflict of interest, and that ethical guidelines are strictly followed throughout the publication process. In addition to managing the editorial board and coordinating with associate editors and reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief is also tasked with promoting the journal’s visibility, encouraging high-quality submissions, and ensuring timely publication of accepted articles. When ethical concerns, complaints, or allegations of misconduct arise, the Editor-in-Chief is expected to investigate thoroughly and take appropriate corrective actions, in line with international standards such as those recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). They also serve as a liaison between authors, reviewers, and the publisher, maintaining transparent communication and upholding the journal’s academic mission.
Manuscript Submission Oversight : Monitor the journal’s submission platform for newly received manuscripts. Conduct an initial screening to check for scope alignment, formatting, and ethical compliance (e.g., plagiarism check, conflicts of interest). Assign suitable Associate Editors or Editorial Board members to handle manuscripts based on subject expertise.
Reviewer Selection and Peer Review Coordination : Ensure that appropriate reviewers are selected, ideally two or more, with relevant subject matter expertise. Confirm that selected reviewers have no conflicts of interest. Monitor the peer-review process to ensure timely responses and quality feedback. Address cases where reviewers delay, decline, or provide unprofessional feedback.
Decision-Making on Manuscripts : Review peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Make a final decision (Accept, Revise, Reject) based on the manuscript’s quality, reviewer feedback, and journal standards. Communicate decisions clearly and professionally to the authors, including reasons for rejections or revision suggestions.
Ethical Compliance and Integrity Checks: Ensure all manuscripts meet ethical standards, especially those involving human or animal research. Handle cases of plagiarism, authorship disputes, data fabrication, or other misconduct by following COPE guidelines. Issue corrections, retractions, or editorial notices when necessary.
Coordination with Editorial Board : Lead regular meetings with the editorial team to review policies, set goals, and discuss issues. Collaborate with Associate Editors on handling high-volume submissions or special cases. Recruit qualified reviewers and board members to expand the journal’s editorial expertise.
Communication and Author Relations : Maintain professional and transparent communication with authors during the review and decision process. Encourage submissions from reputable researchers and institutions. Address author queries and appeals with fairness and confidentiality.
Publication and Production Oversight : Work with the production team to ensure manuscripts are edited, formatted, and published on schedule. Approve final versions of articles before publication. Ensure accuracy in metadata, author details, figures, and references.
Journal Development and Strategy : Promote the journal to increase its visibility, citations, and impact. Oversee special issues, thematic calls, and invited papers. Evaluate journal metrics and implement strategies to improve quality and reputation.
Policy Development and Compliance : Establish and update editorial policies and ethical guidelines. Ensure compliance with indexing requirements (e.g., Scopus, Web of Science, SCIE, ESCI, PubMed). Align journal practices with international publishing standards (e.g., COPE).
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Authors submitting to IJRDES must ensure that:
Originality & Plagiarism : Submitted work must be original, unpublished, and not under review elsewhere. Any form of plagiarism, data manipulation, or duplication is strictly prohibited. Proper citations must be provided for all referenced ideas, data, and content.
Authorship : All listed authors must have significantly contributed to the research work. The order of authors should be decided collectively before submission. Adding or removing authors after submission requires written consent from all authors.
Data Accuracy : Authors must present accurate data and findings. Fabrication, falsification, or misrepresentation of data is considered misconduct.
Conflict of Interest: Any financial or personal relationships that may influence research must be disclosed.
Ethical Compliance: Studies involving humans, animals, or sensitive materials must include relevant ethical approvals. Authors must follow institutional and national research guidelines.
Corrections & Retractions: If errors are found after publication, authors must notify the editor promptly. Authors may request a correction or retraction in case of serious issues.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published content.
Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Information within the manuscript must not be shared or used for personal benefit.
Objectivity: Reviews must be fair, unbiased, and based solely on academic merit. Personal criticism of authors is not acceptable.
Timeliness: Reviewers should complete the evaluation within the given timeframe. If unable to review, they must inform the editor promptly.
Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts where there is a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical Vigilance: Reviewers should alert the editor if they suspect plagiarism, data issues, or ethical violations.
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Editors ensure that the journal maintains ethical and professional publishing standards.
Fair Decision-Making: Editorial decisions must be based solely on the manuscript’s academic value. Editors must not discriminate based on gender, religion, ethnicity, or affiliation.
Confidentiality : Editors must not disclose information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authorized personnel.
Management of Misconduct: If unethical behaviour is detected, editors must investigate promptly. In cases of serious issues, the journal may issue corrections, retractions, or editorial notes.
Transparency: The editorial team ensures a transparent and unbiased review process. All conflicts of interest affecting editorial decisions must be declared and managed.
User and Authors Guidelines
Handling of Complaints and Appeals : IJRDES follows a structured process to address complaints related to Authorship disputes, Ethical Violations, Conflicts of interest , Peer review concerns, Post-publication issues. Complaints can be submitted via the journal’s official email. The editorial team will review, investigate, and resolve the matter in accordance with publication ethics guidelines.
Plagiarism & Misconduct Policy: IJRDES uses standard plagiarism detection tools to ensure originality. The journal may take the following actions if misconduct is found like Immediate rejection of the manuscript, Notification to the corresponding author’s institution, Publication of a retraction or correction note, Restriction from future submissions. IJRDES maintains zero tolerance toward plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
Transparency & Open Access Ethics: All published articles are freely accessible without subscription barriers. Authors retain full rights to their work under open-access terms. Funding sources (if any) must be clearly acknowledged.
Editors' Responsibilities
Editors are essential in ensuring the journal’s quality, fairness, and integrity. They evaluate manuscripts for originality, relevance, and ethical compliance, and oversee a transparent peer-review process by assigning qualified reviewers. Editors maintain confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, and address any ethical concerns such as plagiarism or data issues. They provide clear feedback to authors, support decision-making, and contribute to the journal’s growth and continuous improvement.
Initial Manuscript Evaluation : Review newly assigned manuscripts to assess their relevance, originality, and suitability for the journal. Conduct a preliminary check for basic quality standards, such as structure, grammar, and compliance with submission guidelines. Identify and report any potential ethical concerns (e.g., Plagiarism, Duplicate Submission, Authorship Issues).
Managing the Peer Review Process: Select qualified and unbiased peer reviewers with expertise in the manuscript’s subject area. Ensure the review process follows a double-blind model (if applicable) to maintain impartiality. Monitor the progress of reviews, sending reminders to reviewers as needed to ensure timely feedback. Assess reviewer comments and ensure they are constructive, respectful, and professionally written.
Making Editorial Recommendations: Evaluate the quality of reviewer feedback and the manuscript’s contribution to the field. Recommend one of the following to the Editor-in-Chief: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject. In cases of revision, provide the authors with clear, actionable guidance based on reviewer and editorial feedback.
Ensuring Ethical Compliance: Ensure that submitted manuscripts adhere to ethical research practices, especially those involving human or animal subjects. Report any suspected misconduct (e.g., data falsification, plagiarism) to the Editor-in-Chief immediately. Help resolve disputes related to authorship, conflicts of interest, or reviewer bias, following COPE guidelines.
Maintaining Confidentiality and Objectivity: Keep all manuscript content, author identities, and reviewer feedback strictly confidential. Refrain from using any information obtained through the editorial process for personal or academic advantage. Recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a personal or professional conflict of interest exists.
Communication and Decision Support: Communicate decisions and revisions clearly and respectfully to authors. Act as a liaison between authors and reviewers when clarification or additional explanation is needed. Consult with the Editor-in-Chief on complex or borderline cases to ensure consistency in editorial standards.
Supporting Journal Development: Contribute to the growth and visibility of the journal by recommending high-quality submissions. Suggest topics for special issues or thematic collections. Participate in editorial board meetings and strategic planning initiatives.
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Consider the risk environment | Treat every situation involving AI the same way |
| Tell people when you use AI to create or supplement work | Assume accuracy from AI-generated content and images |
| Consider the copyright implications of using AI | Ignore biases in AI-generated content and images |
| Have a human review all AI-generated work | Prompt AI to say or do harmful or biased things |
Impact Factor
Scopus & Web of Science under Evalution
