Journal & Conference
FlowThe Journal paper flow represents the systematic process through which a research manuscript progresses from submission to publication. It begins with manuscript preparation, where authors format their work according to the journal’s guidelines, including sections like Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, and References. Once submitted, the manuscript undergoes initial editorial screening to check for relevance, originality, formatting, and ethical compliance. Eligible papers are then sent for peer review typically single-blind, double-blind, or open review where experts evaluate the research quality, methodology, accuracy, and significance. Based on reviewer feedback, the editor communicates decisions to the authors, which may include acceptance, minor/major revisions, or rejection. Revised manuscripts are reassessed before final acceptance.After acceptance, the paper is copyedited, formatted, and assigned a DOI (10.63328) before online and/or print publication. This structured flow ensures quality, credibility, and global visibility of scholarly work.
After a manuscript is accepted and published, the post-publication phase ensures its visibility, accessibility, and long-term impact. Published articles are formatted, assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), and made available online, allowing global access to researchers and practitioners. Authors typically receive a digital certificate of publication acknowledging their contribution. Following publication, articles are submitted for indexing in reputed academic databases and citation directories, such as Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and others, depending on the journal’s scope and agreements. Indexing enhances discoverability, citation potential, and academic credibility.In addition, journals often promote published research through social media, newsletters, and institutional channels. Authors may provide supplementary materials, corrections, or updates to maintain transparency and ongoing engagement. These post-publication and indexing procedures ensure that research remains accessible, citable, and impactful, strengthening the overall integrity and reach of scholarly communication.
The Conference (Internationa/National) Flow outlines the structured process through which research is presented, reviewed, and disseminated in an academic conference. It begins with a call for papers, where authors are invited to submit manuscripts or abstracts according to the conference guidelines. Submissions typically include key sections such as Title, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methodology, Results, and References. Once submitted, papers undergo initial editorial screening for relevance, formatting, and originality. Eligible submissions are then sent for peer review often single-blind or double-blind to evaluate research quality, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field.After review, authors receive decisions, including acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection. Accepted papers are scheduled for oral or poster presentations during the conference. Following presentation, selected high-quality papers may be published in conference proceedings or associated journals, often with DOI assignment and indexing for wider visibility. This structured flow ensures academic rigor, quality dissemination, and meaningful scholarly interaction.
After a conference, the post-publication phase ensures that presented research is properly documented, accessible, and recognized. Selected papers from the conference are compiled into proceedings, formatted according to the publisher’s or journal’s standards, and assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for permanent online identification. Authors receive confirmation and digital certificates acknowledging publication.The published proceedings are then submitted for indexing in reputable databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, enhancing discoverability, citation potential, and academic credibility. Indexing allows researchers worldwide to access, reference, and build upon the presented work. Some conferences also encourage post-conference updates or extended versions of selected papers for journal submission, ensuring ongoing engagement and research quality. This structured post-publication and indexing flow guarantees that conference outputs achieve long-term visibility, impact, and contribution to the scholarly community.
The International Journal for Research in Development in Engineering and Science (IJRDES) follows a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and credibility of published research. Different types of review systems are used in scholarly publishing, each designed to maintain fairness, confidentiality, and academic integrity. A review in academic publishing is the process of evaluating a submitted manuscript to ensure its quality, originality, and contribution to the field before publication. The peer review process helps maintain high research standards and ensures that only valid, credible, and well-structured studies are published. The procedure begins with an initial editorial screening to check the manuscript’s relevance, formatting, and ethical compliance. Suitable papers are then sent to expert reviewers for in-depth evaluation under a double-blind system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure fairness and objectivity. Reviewers assess the paper’s methodology, accuracy, clarity, and originality and provide constructive feedback. Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor decides whether the paper is accepted, revised, or rejected. This systematic review procedure ensures that all published work meets the journal’s standards of academic excellence and integrity.
Single-Blind Peer Review is a widely used manuscript evaluation method in academic publishing where the reviewer is aware of the author’s identity, but the author does not know the reviewer’s identity. This system allows reviewers to assess the manuscript freely, providing honest and critical feedback without fear of retaliation or influence from the author. Reviewers evaluate various aspects of the manuscript, including originality, methodology, clarity, accuracy, and significance of results. They recommend whether the paper should be accepted, revised, or rejected. The confidentiality of the reviewer helps maintain objectivity in assessment while enabling constructive criticism to improve the quality of the manuscript. Although single-blind review can occasionally introduce bias—since reviewers may be influenced by the author’s reputation or affiliation it remains popular due to its efficiency and straightforward implementation. Many journals use it for its ability to balance transparency and reviewer protection.
Double-Blind Peer Review is an evaluation process in which both the author and the reviewer remain anonymous to each other. This system is widely adopted in academic journals, including IJRDES, to ensure fairness, impartiality, and objectivity in assessing manuscripts.During this process, the editor first conducts an initial screening to check for relevance, originality, formatting, and ethical compliance. Eligible manuscripts are then sent to expert reviewers who evaluate the work without knowing the authors’ identities. Reviewers examine the research methodology, accuracy of results, clarity, significance, and overall contribution to the field. Anonymity on both sides minimizes personal, institutional, or geographic bias, allowing decisions to be based solely on scientific merit. Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes a decision to accept, request revisions, or reject the manuscript. Double-blind peer review ensures high-quality, credible publications and maintains the integrity of the academic review process.
Open Peer Review is a manuscript evaluation system in which the identities of both the authors and reviewers are known to each other. Unlike single-blind or double-blind review processes, open review emphasizes transparency, accountability, and constructive scholarly dialogue. In this system, reviewers provide detailed feedback on the manuscript’s originality, methodology, results, clarity, and contribution to the field. Authors can respond to the comments, fostering an interactive discussion that may improve the quality and rigor of the research. Open peer review also allows readers to see reviewer reports alongside the published paper in some journals, enhancing credibility and trust in the research.While this approach promotes accountability and transparency, it requires reviewers to provide fair and unbiased assessments despite knowing the author’s identity. Open peer review is increasingly adopted in progressive journals to strengthen research integrity, collaboration, and visibility of scholarly work.
Collaborative Peer Review is an advanced manuscript evaluation process in which multiple reviewers work together, often interactively, to assess a research paper. Unlike traditional single or double-blind reviews, this system encourages reviewers to discuss findings, share insights, and provide joint recommendations to improve the manuscript’s quality. In this process, each reviewer examines the research methodology, accuracy, clarity, originality, and significance of the work. Reviewers may communicate through online platforms or review management systems to reconcile differing opinions, suggest improvements, and ensure comprehensive feedback. Authors can receive more cohesive and detailed guidance, resulting in a higher-quality revision process. Collaborative peer review fosters transparency, thorough evaluation, and constructive discussion, reducing the likelihood of bias or conflicting feedback. It is particularly useful for interdisciplinary research where input from multiple expertise areas strengthens the scientific rigor and credibility of the final publication. This method enhances both the review process and the overall quality of published work.
Third-Party Peer Review is a manuscript evaluation process where an independent organization or external service, rather than the journal’s in-house editorial team, manages the review of a submitted paper. This approach ensures impartiality, transparency, and professional assessment of the research. In this system, the third-party provider identifies qualified reviewers who evaluate the manuscript’s originality, methodology, clarity, significance, and contribution to the field. Authors and journal editors receive comprehensive reports, including constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement. The process can be single-blind, double-blind, or open, depending on the agreement with the journal. By outsourcing the review process to a neutral party, journals can reduce bias, maintain confidentiality, and ensure high-quality evaluation, especially for specialized or interdisciplinary research. Third-party peer review enhances the credibility of the publication, strengthens research integrity, and helps authors improve their manuscripts before final acceptance.
Post-Publication Peer Review (PPPR) is a process in which a manuscript is evaluated after it has been published online or in a journal issue. Unlike traditional pre-publication review, PPPR allows the wider scientific community to assess, comment on, and critique the research, promoting ongoing evaluation and transparency. In this system, readers, experts, and researchers can submit feedback on the methodology, results, interpretation, and significance of the study. Comments may be published alongside the article or shared through online platforms, fostering discussion and potentially identifying errors, limitations, or areas for improvement. PPPR enhances research quality, accountability, and collaboration by providing continuous scrutiny. It is particularly useful for rapidly evolving fields, controversial findings, or interdisciplinary studies where broader expertise is beneficial. By encouraging active post-publication engagement, this process strengthens scientific integrity and ensures that published research remains relevant and credible over time.
Third-Party Peer Review is a manuscript evaluation process managed by an independent organization or external service rather than the journal’s internal editorial team. This approach ensures unbiased, professional, and transparent assessment of submitted research. In this process, the third-party service identifies qualified reviewers who assess the manuscript’s originality, methodology, clarity, significance, and contribution to the field. Reviewers provide detailed reports, including constructive feedback and recommendations for acceptance, revision, or rejection. The review can follow single-blind, double-blind, or open formats, depending on the journal’s policies. Third-party peer review helps journals maintain objectivity, confidentiality, and high standards, particularly for interdisciplinary or specialized research where expert evaluation is critical. By outsourcing review, journals can reduce editorial workload, mitigate potential bias, and ensure consistent quality. This process also benefits authors by providing comprehensive, professional feedback, improving the manuscript’s clarity, rigor, and overall impact before final publication.
Impact Factor
Scopus & Web of Science under Evalution
