The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) serves as the principal authority in a journal, overseeing all aspects of editorial management and ensuring the quality, integrity, and credibility of published content. The EIC sets the journal’s academic and ethical standards, defines its scope, and establishes editorial policies in accordance with international publication guidelines.

Key responsibilities include Manuscript Oversight, where the EIC screens submissions for scope, originality, and ethical compliance before assigning them to associate editors or reviewers. The EIC ensures a Rigorous and Unbiased Double-Blinded Peer Review Process, maintaining confidentiality, transparency, and fairness throughout. They also make the Final Decision on manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection based on reviewer feedback and editorial evaluation.

The EIC manages the Editorial Board, coordinating tasks among associate editors, section editors, and reviewers, and ensuring timely communication. They uphold Ethical Standards, address issues such as plagiarism or conflicts of interest, and implement corrective measures if misconduct occurs.

Additionally, the EIC plays a strategic role in enhancing the journal’s visibility, indexing, impact, and adherence to best practices in scholarly publishing. By fulfilling these responsibilities, the Editor-in-Chief ensures the journal maintains high academic quality, credibility, and trust within the research community.

Authors are primarily responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, accurate, and ethically conducted. They must provide complete and truthful information about their research, including data, methods, results, and references. All sources, ideas, and data from other works must be properly cited to avoid plagiarism, duplication, or misrepresentation.

Authors are expected to disclose any Conflicts of Interest, funding sources, or affiliations that could influence the interpretation or presentation of their research. They must also obtain necessary ethical approvals for studies involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data and include statements confirming adherence to these standards.

During the peer review process, authors are responsible for responding to reviewer comments thoroughly and respectfully, making necessary revisions in a timely manner. They should also ensure that all co-authors have contributed significantly, agreed to the manuscript content, and approved the final version before submission.

Authors must refrain from submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously and avoid redundant publication. By adhering to these responsibilities, authors uphold the integrity of scientific research, contribute to the reliability and credibility of published literature, and maintain trust within the academic and research community.

Conference Editors are responsible for managing the editorial aspects of conference proceedings, ensuring the quality, integrity, and timely publication of selected papers presented at academic events. They act as the primary liaison between the conference organizing committee, authors, and the journal or proceedings publisher.

Their duties begin with Manuscript Management, including the initial screening of submissions to verify relevance, originality, formatting, and compliance with ethical standards. Conference editors coordinate the Peer Review Process, selecting qualified reviewers, monitoring timely feedback, and ensuring objective, constructive evaluations. They also address reviewer comments and guide authors in revising manuscripts for clarity, accuracy, and scientific rigor.

Conference editors collaborate with the Editor-in-Chief and the organizing committee to make Final Decisions on paper acceptance, revision, or rejection, maintaining consistency with the journal’s policies and standards. They oversee proper acknowledgment of contributors, ensure adherence to copyright regulations, and monitor plagiarism checks.

Additionally, conference editors may contribute to Promotional Activities, facilitate indexing of the proceedings, and ensure that high-quality research reaches the target academic audience. By fulfilling these responsibilities, conference editors uphold the credibility, visibility, and scholarly impact of conference publications, fostering a robust and ethical dissemination of research within the academic community.

Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality, integrity, and credibility of scholarly publications. Their primary responsibility is to provide a fair, objective, and constructive assessment of manuscripts assigned for peer review. Reviewers should evaluate the originality, methodology, accuracy, clarity, and relevance of the research, ensuring that the work meets the journal’s academic and ethical standards.

Reviewers must maintain confidentiality, not sharing or using information from manuscripts for personal gain. They should promptly disclose any conflicts of interest that could bias their evaluation and recuse themselves if necessary. Timeliness is essential; reviewers are expected to submit evaluations within the agreed-upon timeframe to avoid delays in the publication process.

Constructive feedback should be detailed, clear, and actionable, guiding authors to improve the quality of their work while respecting their contributions. Reviewers should also identify ethical concerns such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or redundant publication, reporting these to the editorial team.

By adhering to these responsibilities, reviewers help uphold scientific rigor, ethical standards, and transparency in research publication. Their diligent and impartial evaluations are critical to maintaining the credibility of the journal and ensuring that published research is reliable, high-quality, and impactful within the academic community.