Paper Flow

The publication process of a journal paper is a systematic journey from idea conception to final dissemination. It begins with the research and idea formulation stage, where authors identify a research gap, define objectives, and conduct a comprehensive literature review. Based on this groundwork, the manuscript is drafted, typically including sections such as the introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Clear and concise writing, along with proper citation of sources, is crucial at this stage.

Once the manuscript is ready, the submission stage follows. Authors choose a suitable journal aligned with the research scope and submit their paper, adhering to the journal’s formatting and ethical guidelines. The submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening, where the editor checks for originality, relevance, and adherence to submission standards. Manuscripts passing this stage enter peer review, where experts in the field rigorously evaluate the work for validity, methodology, contribution, and clarity. Reviewers provide detailed feedback, often suggesting revisions.

Authors then enter the revision stage, addressing reviewer comments to improve the paper. Multiple rounds of revision may occur before the editor decides on acceptance or rejection. Once accepted, the manuscript proceeds to copyediting, formatting, and proofing, ensuring clarity, consistency, and compliance with publication standards.

Finally, the paper reaches the publication stage, either online or in print, becoming part of the scholarly record. Some journals also offer early online access prior to print publication. Post-publication, authors may track citations, share the work with the academic community, and incorporate feedback for future research. This structured process ensures the dissemination of high-quality, credible, and impactful research.

About Conference

The flow of conferences and publications follows a structured process. National and Internal with Online, Offline, Hybrid Modes. It begins with Call for Papers, where researchers submit abstracts or full papers. Submissions undergo initial screening by organizers for relevance and quality. Accepted papers are sent for Double-Blinded Peer Review, ensuring accuracy, originality, and significance. Authors may be asked to revise their work based on reviewer feedback. Selected papers are scheduled for presentation at the conference, either orally or as posters. Post-conference, high-quality papers are often recommended for journal publication, undergoing further review and editing. The process concludes with final publication, making the research accessible to the academic community.I want to

1. Conference Flow Structure

Academic conferences usually follow this flow:

  1. Call for Papers (CFP)

    • The conference organizers release a CFP with themes, submission guidelines, deadlines, and review criteria.

  2. Paper Submission

    • Researchers submit their papers via an online system.

    • Papers are formatted according to conference guidelines.

  3. Peer Review

    • Papers are assigned to reviewers (usually 2–4 experts).

    • Reviewers evaluate originality, significance, methodology, clarity, and relevance.

    • Reviewers give scores and comments.

  4. Decision

    • Based on reviews, the program committee decides:

      • Accepted (oral presentation)

      • Accepted (poster presentation)

      • Rejected

    • Sometimes “minor/major revision” is requested.

  5. Camera-Ready Submission

    • Accepted papers are revised according to reviewer feedback.

    • Final version is submitted (camera-ready) for inclusion in proceedings.

  6. Conference Presentation

    • Authors present orally or via posters.

    • Networking and feedback opportunities exist.

  7. Proceedings Publication

    • Accepted papers are published in the conference proceedings, often indexed in databases like IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, or Springer.

2. Journal Publication Flow Structure

Journal publication is usually more rigorous and slower than conferences:

  1. Submission

    • Authors submit manuscripts following journal guidelines.

    • Includes abstract, keywords, full text, references, and sometimes supplementary materials.

  2. Editorial Check

    • Editor screens for fit, plagiarism, and adherence to guidelines.

    • Out-of-scope or low-quality papers are desk-rejected.

  3. Peer Review

    • Usually 2–4 independent reviewers assess the manuscript.

    • Reviewers recommend:

      • Accept

      • Minor revision

      • Major revision

      • Reject

  4. Revision

    • Authors revise the manuscript according to reviewer comments.

    • Responses to reviewers are submitted alongside the revised paper.

  5. Final Decision

    • Editor makes the final decision based on revisions.

  6. Acceptance and Production

    • Paper goes through copyediting, formatting, typesetting, and proofreading.

    • DOI is assigned, and paper is published online and/or in print.

CONFERENCES

No. of Conferences: 0

No. of Registered Authors: 223
No. of Volumes:

VOL 1, VOL 2, VOL 3, VOL 4, VOL 5, VOL 6, VOL 7, VOL 8,

www.ijrdes.com
Journal Publication Flow

The flow of a research paper publication begins with the initial stage, where researchers identify a topic, conduct a literature review, and formulate research questions or hypotheses. This is followed by manuscript preparation, drafting sections like introduction, methodology, results, and discussion. The submission stage involves sending the manuscript to a suitable journal, followed by peer review, where experts evaluate its quality, validity, and originality. Authors address reviewer comments through revisions. Once accepted, the paper undergoes copyediting and formatting by the journal. Finally, the research reaches the publication stage, making it publicly accessible for academic and professional audiences.

  • Manuscript Preparation:
    Authors prepare the manuscript according to the journal’s guidelines, including formatting, referencing, figures, and ethical compliance (e.g., plagiarism check, ethical approvals).

  • Submission:
    The manuscript is submitted via the journal’s online portal. Authors provide metadata, cover letter, and any supporting documents.

  • Initial Screening:
    The editorial team checks the manuscript for scope, originality, compliance with submission guidelines, and ethical considerations. Out-of-scope or incomplete submissions may be desk-rejected.

  • Peer Review Assignment:
    Suitable manuscripts are sent to expert reviewers for double-blind or single-blind peer review. Reviewers assess quality, validity, novelty, and clarity.

  • Review & Decision:
    Reviewers submit reports; the editor evaluates feedback and issues a decision: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

  • Revision (if applicable):
    Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments and resubmit. This step may repeat until reviewers and editors are satisfied.

  • Acceptance:
    Once approved, the manuscript is formally accepted. APCs are applied (if any), and final checks are conducted for ethics, formatting, and references.

  • Production:
    The manuscript undergoes copyediting, typesetting, figure formatting, and proofreading. Authors review proofs and approve final changes.

  • Articles-in-Press (Optional):
    Accepted papers may appear online as preliminary “Articles-in-Press” before final publication.

  • Final Publication:
    The article is published in the journal’s issue, assigned a DOI, indexed in databases, and made openly accessible with all metadata, citations, and archival records.

  • Post-Publication Updates:
    Corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern are issued if errors, ethical issues, or other concerns arise, maintaining transparency and integrity.

×